Re: Unexpected (bug-like) behavior in `git ls-remote` matching.

From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Feb 11, 2023, 02:41 UTC
Message-ID: <Y+cAdZTs5y0yiTkM@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq357eocah.fsf@gitster.g>

On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:43:02AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > But I would hold off on all of that until somebody has a concrete case
> > that shows why their preferred matching scheme is useful.
> 
> True, too.

Let's not forget to fix the documentation, though. Here's a brief series.

  [1/2]: doc/ls-remote: cosmetic cleanups for examples
  [2/2]: doc/ls-remote: clarify pattern format

 Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt | 17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-Peff