Re: [PATCH] git status -q (similar to subversion)
- From
- Unknown <borg@uu3.net>
- Date
- Jun 29, 2009, 19:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906292131330.27727@cube>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090628224447.GB1951@gmail.com>
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, David Aguilar wrote:
> Hello
Hi and thanks for reply.
Show 7 quoted lines
> Please take a look at Documentation/SubmittingPatches > (all of the documentation lives in Documentation/). > > It doesn't seem like this patch was generated with > git format-patch. You'll also want to submit your patch using > git send-email, as we require inline patches instead of > attachments.
Right. I though such a small patch can be provided as is. Anyway, I will take necessary steps to peform better next time.
The question is, would that patch will be applied anyway? I already received some criticism about not applying it. I can only answer that where svn status and git status differ in many cases, there are also similar in some.
For now, I would rather want to see a discus about it (Pro vs Cons).
Other solution I see is add extra config variable like: status.showUntrackedDefault = (no|normal|all) So when you peform 'git status -u' it will be used.
Looks better to me if we really want to have difference between git status vs svn status.
Regards, Borg