Re: [PATCH] Minor portability patch to git-submodule
- From
- Andy Dougherty <doughera@lafayette.edu>
- Date
- Dec 18, 2007, 13:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712180734520.28219@fractal.phys.lafayette.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712172253150.9446@racer.site>
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > - git ls-files --stage -- "$@" | grep -e '^160000 ' | > > + git ls-files --stage -- "$@" | egrep -e '^160000 ' | > > Nack. egrep is not available on all platforms. But then I have to wonder > why not saying "grep '^160000 '" instead?
Your last suggestion is easily and obviously better -- I'll assume you don't need an explicit patch and can just hand-edit mine. Still, I'd have thought egrep was fine. As far as I recall, it goes back to v7 Unix. Or are there non-unix systems at issue (perhaps cygwin variants or something) that have grep but not egrep?
Anyway, thanks.
--
Andy Dougherty doughera@lafayette.edu