Re: git annotate runs out of memory
- From
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
- Date
- Dec 11, 2007, 19:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712111428040.5349@iabervon.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4aca3dc20712111103s1af3b045h484ea749378c6282@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Daniel Berlin wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> It is stored in an easier format. However, can you not simply provide > side-indexes to do the annotation? > > I guess that own't work in git because you can change history (in > other scm's, history is readonly so you could know the results for > committed revisions will never change).
History in git is read-only. It's just that git lets you fork and move forward with something different. Each commit can never change (and, in fact, you'd have to badly break SHA1 to change it), but which commits are relevant to the history can change.
Keeping extra information is fine; at worst, it'll go irrelevant.
-Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*