Re: git guidance

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Nov 28, 2007, 15:46 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711281545170.27959@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <474D70DD.4020601@dawes.za.net>

Hi,

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Rogan Dawes wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

> Al Boldi wrote:
>
> > Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> > > It should not turn into an endless thread led by people who want to 
> > > redefine GIT's roadmap, but experience sharing helps a lot with GIT.
> > 
> > Well, now that you mentioned it, if there is one thing I dislike, it's 
> > for version control to start mutilating your sources.  Version Control 
> > should be completely transparent.  GIT isn't.
> 
> Care to explain? Git is quite happy handling arbitrary binary content, 
> so I find it difficult to believe that it is changing your source code 
> in strange ways.

It is nice of you to ask him to explain: Unless this handwaving claim is substantiated, it is quite hard to argue with.

Ciao, Dscho