Re: [PATCH 0/5] fork/exec removal series
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 30, 2007, 21:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709302212160.28395@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <1191183001-5368-1-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Hi,
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> You can regard this as the beginning of the MinGW port integration.
Thank you very much! This effort cannot be praised enough.
> There still remain a few forks, which fall into these categories: > > - They are in tools or code that are not (yet) ported to MinGW.[*]
The nice thing about the integration effort: It does not need to be done in one go.
> - The fork()s are not followed by exec(). These need a different > implementation. I am thinking of a start_coroutine()/finish_coroutine() > API that is implemented with threads in MinGW. (Suggestions of a better > as well as implementations are welcome.)
Is there more than the case I introduced with shallow clones?
Thanks, Dscho