Re: Repository backups
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 19, 2007, 15:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709191627040.28395@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <31e9dd080709190814t6ef8b725w8a8320685e70578b@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Jason Sewall wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> I'd like to build a modest safety net for my various git repositories > in case of catastrophic failure. Currently, everything is backed up on > machines in the same building. I'm not expecting the Computer Science > building to get hit by terrorists and we're in a seismically stable > place, but there *is* construction nearby... > > Anyway, my university offers a "mass storage" tape-based service that > is supposedly very safe. We are encouraged to give them single big > files for backups. > > The temptation to just make bundles of all branch heads is great but > probably not what I really want - things like reflogs don't get handed > off with those, if I understand correctly. > > Is there any argument against just making a tar of a bare clone of the > repo?
If you make a bare clone, you lose reflogs, too.
So I would backup the complete .git/ directory instead.
Hth, Dscho