Re: cloning/pulling hooks
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 29, 2007, 14:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708291529010.28586@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070829141948.GJ10749@pasky.or.cz>
Hi,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Petr Baudis wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:06:17PM CEST, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > I think that they are way more than just technical issues: the > > chicken-and-egg problem is certainly _not_ a technical issue. > > What do you mean by the chicken-and-egg problem? I think I missed that.
What if hooks/update is in your set? It _does not_ run before it is checked out, but of course, some ref is updated before it is checked out.
Show 7 quoted lines
> > _All_ of the arguments I read are along the lines "we want to enforce > > some coding styles" or similar. These issues are _orthogonal_ to the > > question which SCM is used. > > Your company has certain rules on how all the source on the public > branches should look like, etc. It's not quite clear to me how can build > system enforce these rules.
The same as a hook. You just put the check into the Makefile.
Ciao, Dscho