Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add "--only-untracked" flag to status commands.
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 25, 2007, 14:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708251639100.16728@wbgn129.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <0748D6C4-C72F-4271-9372-3EBFC249FFE2@pp.inet.fi>
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, V?in? J?rvel wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Aug 24, 2007, at 12:55, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, V?in? J?rvel wrote: > > > I also think that maintaining a proper .gitignore is imporant, and > > > more productive than using --only-tracked instead. But when I have > > > cruft that can't be put in .gitignore, or it would ignore files that > > > are supposed to be shown and tracked, I use --only-tracked. > > > > Would it not be better to imitate the "-x" and "-X" options of > > ls-files, then? You could achieve the effect you desire by "git > > status -x \*" then. > > I haven't used that option, do I understand correctly, that with that > option, you should provide another exclusion file? That would remove the > dynamic ability of --only-tracked.
-X takes a filename, -x a pattern.
Hth, Dscho