Re: [PATCH] git log -g: Complain, but do not fail, when no reflogs are there

> On 7/24/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Alex Riesen wrote:
> > > On 7/24/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When asking "git log -g --all", clearly you want to see only those refs
> > > > that do have reflogs, but you do not want it to fail, either.
> > > >
> > > > So instead of die()ing, complain about it, but move on to the other
> > refs.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I believe you wont even see these complaints: the pager will start shortly
> > > afterwards and fill the screen with commits, completely hiding the errors.
> > 
> > You can see it briefly, but it is hidden by default.  Which is a good
> > thing.  If you set the pager to "cat" (which is happily not the default!)
> > you can see them clearly.  Until you are swamped by the rest of the
> > output.
> > 
> > Maybe this is a feature?
> > 
> 
> Maybe. I can't see it at all. Should I downgrade something or propose
> a patch to put some delay after this error? I think not.
> 
> I think second Junios suggestion, but this is of course no
> difference to me.