Re: git-fetch will leave a ref pointing to a tag

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Jul 3, 2007, 12:01 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707031257590.4071@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <20070703041859.GB4007@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Hi,

On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Jeff King wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

> On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:23:15PM -0400, linux@horizon.com wrote:
> 
> > And until git-merge-ff is available, what's the recommended way to
> > "advance master to tag <foo>, but only if that wouldn't lose anything?"
> 
> You can ask "do I have anything that foo doesn't?":
> 
>   test "`git-rev-list foo.. | wc -l`" -gt 0

If it is only the test, you can do that by

	test $(git merge-base foo bar) = $(git rev-parse foo)

(which tests if foo is a stricth ancestor of bar). Although in your (linux@horizon.com's) place I would really look at "git log foo.." myself, as peff almost suggested.

For if you (linux@horizon.com) _have_ changes, you want to know which changes they are, right?

Of course, it seems to me that what you (linux@horizon.com; do you really have no proper name?) _really_ wanted to do is "git rebase v2.6.22-rc7".

Ciao, Dscho