Re: git-format-patch for binary files / merges [Re: Expose subprojects as special files to "git diff" machinery]
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Apr 19, 2007, 08:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704191026500.8822@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704180831330.2828@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> As to merges, they are certainly something that *can* be represented as a > patch [...]
> However, representing merges as a patch doesn't really make much sense.
Not if you want to apply it. But if you want to review it. That's why we have the combined diff format, which can be generated by diff, but not applied.
Ciao, Dscho