Re: GIT and the current -stable

From: Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
Date: Apr 15, 2007, 00:23 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704150110490.17780@beast.quantumfyre.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <46216001.3000503@gmail.com>

On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Rene Herman wrote:

Show 6 quoted lines

>
> "v2.6.20.7" seems to be the only tag from the stable branches that's present
>  in this tree?
>
> rene@7ixe4:[...]$ git tag -l | grep "v2\.6\.[[:digit:]]\{1,2\}\."
> v2.6.20.7

Obviously I don't know how Chris created his conglomerated repo, but I just made one of my own, and it has all the tags I would expect in it ... so it's not an inherent git problem (or not in 1.5.1.1 anyway).

I guess that Chris created his in such a way that the automated tag following code didn't trigger? (Or maybe used a really old git?)

(Mine's at http://git.q42.co.uk/w/stable.git if anyone is interested enough to want to look at it ...)

It only took me 4 commands to create too (ok, so three of them were bash for loops ... and I did do a little bit more to tidy up), I do enjoy using flexible tools :D.

-- 
Julian

  ---
Go slowly to the entertainments of thy friends, but quickly to their
misfortunes.
 		-- Chilo