Re: [PATCH 1/5] t1000: fix case table.
- From
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
- Date
- Apr 7, 2007, 18:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704071400190.27922@iabervon.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vbqi0ckpn.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Case #10 is not handled with unpack-trees.c:threeway_merge() > internally, unless under the agressive rule, and it is not a > bug. As the test expects, ND (one side did not do anything, > other side deleted) case was meant to be handled by the caller's > policy (e.g. git-merge-one-file or git-merge-recursive).
Looks like I neglected to update (or remove) that table; Documentation/technical/trivial-merge.txt agrees with your change.
-Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*