Re: pack v4 status
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Feb 27, 2007, 21:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702271348260.12485@woody.linux-foundation.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070227155042.GB3230@spearce.org>
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > We have thus far reformatted OBJ_TREEs with a new dictionary based > compression scheme. In this scheme we pool the filenames and modes > that appear within trees into a single table within the packfile. > All trees are then converted to use a 22 byte record format: > > - 2 byte network byte order index into the string pool > - 20 byte SHA-1
Umm. Am I missing something, or is this totally braindamaged?
Are you really expecting there to never be more than 64k basenames? Trust me, that's a totally broken assumption. Anything that tracks generated stuff will _easily_ have several tens of thousands of random filenames even in a single tree, much less over the whole history of the repository.
Linus