Re: [PATCH 11/17] Fully activate the sliding window pack access.
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Dec 23, 2006, 20:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612231207400.3671@woody.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vodpuqtuf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > I have been thinking that we should perhaps change Cygwin > default to NO_MMAP. Safer but slower would be better than not > working correctly for people on FAT32.
The thing is, with a smaller pack access window, it might not even be slower. I don't know just _how_ many hoops cygwin jumps through for mmap, and maybe mmap under cygwin is actually perfectly fine, but at the same time I do suspect that UNIX mmap semantics are a lot harder to emulate than just a regular "pread()", so it's quite possible that by avoiding mmap you could avoid a lot of complex cygwin code.
And yes, making it all work on FAT32 would obviously be a good thing.
Only testing (or somebody who knows cygwin well) can tell.
Linus