Re: [PATCH] Use diff3 instead of merge in merge-recursive.
- From
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
- Date
- Oct 19, 2006, 06:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610190229590.9789@iabervon.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610180835000.3962@g5.osdl.org>
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> As to why git uses "merge" - I have this strong memory of having seen > machines that had one but not the other, and that, along with the fact > that I've used "merge" personally, is why we call "merge" rather than > diff3. > > In Linux systems, "merge" usually comes with the RCS package, and "diff3" > is usually from "diffutils". It may be that "diff3" is more common. I'm > not sure what the history is, and what the situation would tend to be like > on other systems..
AFAICT, "merge" actually execs "diff3", so if a system has only one, either it's diff3, it's a "merge" from somewhere other than current rcs, or it doesn't actually work.
-Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*