Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Jun 16, 2006, 06:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606152335130.5498@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <ef5305790606152249n2702873fy7b708d9c47c78470@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Goo GGooo wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > Thanks for explanation. Unfortunately I can't use git:// with "git > pull" (at least in git-1.3.2). First it does some traffic, that > suddenly stops - I guess the server starts doing *something*, perhaps > preparing the update for me or whatnot.
Yeah, for a big pull, the server will have to think about the objects it is going to send you.
> I suggest adding SO_KEEPALIVE option on the git socket.
Actually, the really irritating thing is that we actually generate all these nice status updates, which just makes pulling and cloning a lot more comfortable, because you actually see what is going on, and what to expect.
Except they only work over ssh, where we have a separate channel (for stderr), and with the native git protocol all that nice status work just gets flushed to /dev/null :(
Dang. It's literally the most irritating part of the thing: the protocol itself is exactly the same whether you go over ssh:// or over git://, but that visual information about what is going on is missing, and it's surprisingly important from a usability standpoint.
And in your case, the usability downside actually turned into a real accessibility bug.
Oh, well.
Linus