git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [RFC] get_sha1() shorthands for blob/tree objects

From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Date
Apr 19, 2006, 01:43 UTC
Message-ID
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0604181836400.3701@g5.osdl.org>
In-Reply-To
<7vd5fecpyd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> > 	git diff v0.99.6:git-commit-script git-commit.sh
> >
> > which parses as one SHA1 of a blob (put onto the rev.pending_objects 
> > list), and one filename (in the rev.prune_data array). We could decide to 
> > automatically do the "right thing" for that case too.
> 
> The "right thing" is ambiguous, I am afraid.
> 
> I think it would be natural to interpret the request as a diff
> between the blob from v0.99.6 and a random working tree file, 
> which may not even exist in the index.

Actually, it's not ambiguous. Just take the named file. If you want to diff it against HEAD:<named-file>, you should just say so.

Now, if you _really_ want to be difficult, there's a third option: to diff it against the named file as named in the index. "git diff" does have the "--cached" option that would make that case unambiguous too, of course.

Ie:
 (a) diff against the current HEAD:
	git diff v0.99.6:git-commit-script HEAD:git-commit.sh
 (b) diff against the current index contents for "git-commit.sh":
	git diff --cached v0.99.6:git-commit-script git-commit.sh
 (c) diff against a random file (which may not even be in the index):
	git diff v0.99.6:git-commit-script git-commit.sh
are all sensible operations, and unambiguous.

The only real downside is that the nice "a..b" syntax doesn't work for them, except fot the very first case. That syntax requires both sides to be SHA1 names (and while the "index" case could be a SHA1 name, we have no way to say so).

Show 6 quoted lines
> Oh, another possibility is to act as if the user said
> 
> 	git diff v0.99.6:this :git-commit.sh
> 
> where "(empty):" would stand for "look up in the index, not in a
> tree".

That would possibly be a nice extension, yes. But I really did mean "random file, possibly not even in the index".

> Unfortunatly, I do not think this parses well:
> 
> 	git diff git-commit.sh v0.99.6:git-commit-script
Correct. As you point out, that would have to be done with -R.
			Linus
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 14 of 24 in “[RFC] get_sha1() shorthands for blob/tree objects”
  1. Linus TorvaldsApr 18, 2006
  2. Martin LanghoffApr 19, 2006
  3. Shawn PearceApr 19, 2006
  4. Ray LehtiniemiApr 19, 2006
  5. Junio C HamanoApr 19, 2006
  6. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2006
  7. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2006
  8. Andreas EricssonApr 19, 2006
  9. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2006
  10. Junio C HamanoApr 19, 2006
  11. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2006
  12. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2006
  13. Junio C HamanoApr 19, 2006
  14. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2006
  15. Junio C HamanoApr 19, 2006
  16. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2006
  17. Junio C HamanoApr 19, 2006
  18. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2006
  19. Martin LanghoffApr 19, 2006
  20. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2006
  21. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2006
  22. [RFC] get_sha1(): :path and :[0-3]:path to extract from index.Junio C Hamano, Apr 22, 2006
  23. Uwe ZeisbergerApr 25, 2006
  24. Junio C HamanoApr 25, 2006

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.