Re: Following renames
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Mar 26, 2006, 23:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603261509320.15714@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vodzsq12g.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes: > > >> No, it's the expected output just because you expected merges to always > >> show up. Merges get ignored if any of the parents have the same content > >> already. > > > > Eek. Can I avoid that? What was the reason for choosing this behavior? > > Perhaps rev-list --sparse?
No. "--sparse" still removes the uninteresting parents of merges. It just doesn't then make the linear history any denser.
Linus