Re: [PATCH] nicer eye candies for pack-objects
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Feb 22, 2006, 23:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602221835570.5606@localhost.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602221502410.3771@g5.osdl.org>
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Well, my thinking behind the original unpack-objects behaviour was that we > don't really care about the max 100 extra packets.
Obviously, the "every percent" has at most 100 additional packets.
And if it updates too fast to be readable, that means it'll be over in a snap anyway.
So I don't have any objections left.
Nicolas