Re: git-ls-files -o no recurse?
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Jan 7, 2006, 19:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601071131570.3169@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vace7khbi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > I have been unsure about the name "--directory", like you said.
Well, I didn't like "--directory" either, but couldn't come up with anything better. How about just "--no-recurse", which is not technically accurate (we always recurse into directories we know about), but might be more understandable.
The reason I called it "--directory" was that it would talk about directories that it doesn't know about (as opposed to individual files it doesn't know about). So "--other --directory" kind of makes sense if you read it that way ("show files and directories we don't know about").
But yeah, it's not a great name.
Linus