Re: git-whatchanged does not show merge result?
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2005, 18:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510141138030.23590@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4dd15d180510141031n531b9e0enc8e7d668b1e61b83@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, David Ho wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > I was a little worried when I did git-whatchanged on a file and there > was a hole in the history where the merge is. This reassured me that > all changes to the file is accessible (I'm sure they are all stored > safely in the repo =).
Btw, "git-whatchanged" really _can_ hide real stuff, namely when nothing changed.
A commit that has no changes at all (which is quite possible) will never be shown by git-whatchanged.
So in many ways, "git log" is the way to see all commits. "git-whatchanged" is really just a way to see the _changes_, and by defauly it ignores merges just because the changes are "complicated".
Linus