Re: Submodule object store
- From
- David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
- Date
- Mar 26, 2007, 23:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0703261515330.14387@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070326233603.GL22773@admingilde.org>
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Martin Waitz wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 04:28:28PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org> writes: >> >>> To make purge and fsck work we have the hard requirement that it >>> must be possible to list all objects which belong to one submodule. >> >> I understand you would want to separate the ref namespace, but I >> still do not see why you would want to have a separate object >> store, laid out in a funny way. Unless you are thinking about >> using rsync to transfer object store, that is. > > I want to be able to list all objects which are not reachable in the > object store, without traversing all submodules at the same time. > The only way I can think of to achieve this is to have one separate > object store per submodule and then do the traversal per submodule.
why do you want to optimize for the relativly rare fsck function rather then the more common read functions (which would benifit from shareing object that are identical between projects)?
David Lang