Re: git merge and merge message
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Mar 11, 2007, 21:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0703112241040.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <45F46713.6030702@qumranet.com>
Hi,
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Comments? Do people think it would be a good idea to do > > > > git merge --no-fast-forward -m "Merge feature Xyz" xyz-branch > > > > as an option? > > > > > > Actually there's at least one tree where this should be activated -- > yours. If you perform a fast-forward merge, there's no record of the > merge, no record of which tree was pulled, and no sign-off from you. > The commits just appear there. It partially defeats the sign-off > system. > > This feature would be good for top-level trees and for major subsystem > trees IMO.
What? You should sign-off on stuff you did not review? Or do you review the stuff _before_ merging? I don't.
Ciao, Dscho