Re: restriction of pulls
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 12, 2007, 14:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0702121508360.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <45D07296.7070804@dawes.za.net>
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Rogan Dawes wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > (my favourite:) > > - use git-split to create a new branch, which only contains doc/. Do work > > only on that branch, and merge into mainline from time to time. > > Your third option sounds quite clever, apart from the problem of attributing a > commit and a commit message to someone, when the actual commit doesn't match > what they actually did :-(
This problem is not related to subprojects at all. If the commit message does not match the patch, you are always fscked.
> As well as wondering what happens when they check out a few more files. Do we > rewrite those commits as well? What happens if the user has made some commits > already? What happens if they have already sent those upstream? etc.
I think you misunderstood. My favourite option would make docs a _separate_ project, with its own history. It just happens to be pulled from time to time, just like git-gui, gitk and git-fast-import in git.git.
> I think the best solution is ultimately to make git able to cope with > certain missing objects.
Hmm. I am not convinced. On nice thing about git is its level of integrity. Which means that no random objects are missing.
Show 7 quoted lines
> I started writing this in response to another message, but it will do fine > here, too: > > The description I give here will likely horrify people in terms of > communications inefficiency, but I'm sure that can be improved. > > [goes on... and describes the lazy clone!]
AFAICT this really is the lazy clone. And it was already determined that it is all to easy to pull in all commit objects by accident. Which boils down to a substantial chunk of the repository.
But if you want to play with it: by all means, go ahead. It might just be that you overcome the fundamental difficulties, and we get something nice out of it.
Ciao, Dscho