Re: [PATCH] add --remote option to git-clone.
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 1, 2007, 23:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0702020050190.18870@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070201234706.GP17617@mellanox.co.il>
Hi,
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > Quoting Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] add --remote option to git-clone. > > > > Of course, you'd have to > > support this, too: > > > > $ git clone --branch topic1 --branch topic2 git://... > > Why is this useful?
For the same reasons it might be useful to track _all_ branches.
> and which branch to check out?
I'd say the first, but that's just my opinion.
> One can always get more branches later, is my approach.
Yes. But in the same vein, one can add _one_ branch to an empty repo either. So, with your reasoning, your patch wouldn't be needed to begin with.
But I find it useful. Even the version where you are not limited to one branch.
Ciao, Dscho