Re: [PATCH 2/4] merge-one-file: use 'wc' more portably

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > Some wc prefix the number by a tab. Be prepared for this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
> > ---
> >  git-merge-one-file.sh |    4 ++--
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/git-merge-one-file.sh b/git-merge-one-file.sh
> > index 7d62d79..bc7c5ef 100755
> > --- a/git-merge-one-file.sh
> > +++ b/git-merge-one-file.sh
> > @@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ case "${1:-.}${2:-.}${3:-.}" in
> >  		# This extracts OUR file in $orig, and uses git-apply to
> >  		# remove lines that are unique to ours.
> >  		orig=`git-unpack-file $2`
> > -		sz0=`wc -c <"$orig"`
> > +		sz0=`wc -c <"$orig" | tr -dc 0-9`
> >  		diff -u -La/$orig -Lb/$orig $orig $src2 | git-apply --no-add 
> > -		sz1=`wc -c <"$orig"`
> > +		sz1=`wc -c <"$orig" | tr -dc 0-9`
> >  
> >  		# If we do not have enough common material, it is not
> >  		# worth trying two-file merge using common subsections.
> 
> I would prefer losing dq around the $sz0 and $sz1 where they are
> used, instead of spawning tr here, and also tighten error
> checking by stringing these command sequence with && followed by
> a || exit.