Re: [PATCH] git-remote exclude

> On Monday 2007 January 15 21:56, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > I do not think you are interested in "not these two but everything 
> > else".  You are interested in maint, master, next, pu and man.  You 
> > can get away by saying "not these two but everything else" only 
> > because you are implicitly trusting me not to publish insane number of 
> > random throw-away branches left and right.
> 
> Nope.  I think I'm right.  You're right that I'm trusting you not to 
> publish an insane number of branches, but that holds for the glob-mode 
> only, regardless of whether the NOT fetches are in place.  The sort of 
> thing I imagine happening is that as maintainer you suddenly say - I 
> think 1.5.0 is so good that we'll maintain it for longer than usual.  
> In which case we would suddenly get a branch for maint-1.5.0.  I would 
> want that branch, but I still don't want man, html and todo.