Re: On boolean configuration variables...
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jun 25, 2006, 14:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0606251553110.29667@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <e7m3b6$eoa$1@sea.gmane.org>
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Anand Kumria wrote:
> Allowing 'yes' and 'no' to equal 'true' and 'false' respectively sounds > pretty sane and user-friendly. > > Why wouldn't you want to do that?
'Cause you'd have to add "maybe", too ;-)
Seriously, there is a subtle side to booleans, which is the reason that they typically take on only "false" and "true": Consider the question "Is the box not red?". If the answer is "yes", I do not know if "yes, the box is red" or "yes, the box is not red".
"true" and "false" are less ambiguous.
Ciao, Dscho