git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Effective difference between git-rebase and git-resolve

From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date
Mar 25, 2006, 09:37 UTC
Message-ID
<Pine.LNX.4.63.0603251034550.14457@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To
<7v1wwrys07.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> If nobody in the upper echelon of kernel people (meaning, longest-time 
> git users) use git-resolve anymore, I think we should mark it deprecated 
> and remove it eventually.

I am nowhere near kernel people, but I am using git on a machine where it is too cumbersome to install python. If git-resolve goes, I am without a merge strategy (at least until git-recursive is ported to C... was that not the plan with git-merge-tree? What happened on that front?).

Ciao, Dscho

Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Mark Wooding
Message 8 of 10 in “Effective difference between git-rebase and git-resolve”
  1. Marc SingerMar 25, 2006
  2. Linus TorvaldsMar 25, 2006
  3. Junio C HamanoMar 25, 2006
  4. Marc SingerMar 25, 2006
  5. Junio C HamanoMar 25, 2006
  6. J. Bruce FieldsMar 26, 2006
  7. Junio C HamanoMar 25, 2006
  8. Johannes SchindelinMar 25, 2006
  9. Mark WoodingMar 25, 2006
  10. Johannes SchindelinMar 25, 2006

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.