Re: [PATCH] First cut at libifying revlist generation
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 27, 2006, 09:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0602270947380.5937@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpsl93395.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes gets a test-pilot star for this. This also means we need a bit > better set of tests.
Well, I don't deserve this. I cheated.
In my personal version of git, there are a few subtle things different than in the official version. Most of them, I sent out already, and they were rejected, such as http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/10718, which helped me tremendously in identyfing the bug.
But there is also a test case in my version, which was a failure, originally. I wrote it to demonstrate that the stupid version of git-fetch was stupid. It did not demonstrate that, but rather quite a bit of (my) normal usage. That is the reason it takes a really long time for a test case, and that in turn is the reason I did not dare to submit it.
Ciao, Dscho