Re: Get rid of .git/branches/ and .git/remotes/?

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Nov 23, 2005, 15:08 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511231553390.8191@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <438371E8.2030701@op5.se>

Hi,

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Andreas Ericsson wrote:

Show 7 quoted lines

> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > 
> > 	git-config-set --get remote.origin.url
> > 
> 
> So... "git-config-set" is used for both getting and setting? Why not just
> "git-config --set" and "git-config --get" to make things a bit less confusing?

I tried to do this more like a proof of a concept (Yeah, famous last words...) and tried to be not so intrusive. There is already a config.c, and to keep with the naming, this would have to move to config-lib.c to make space for config.c which really is the source for git-config$(X).

Should we rename config.c to config-lib.c, and config-set.c to config.c? Personally, I think it too intrusive, but what the heck.

Ciao, Dscho