Comments in read-tree about #nALT
- From
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
- Date
- Aug 27, 2005, 06:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508270151590.23242@iabervon.org>
I've gotten to the point of having all of the entries for a given path ready to put into the cache at the same, and now I want to convert the merge functions to take their data directly, rather than in the cache, so that they can take extra entries for extra ancestors.
Part of threeway_merge, however, wants to search the rest of the cache for interfering entries in some cases, which would have to happen differently, because I won't have the cache completely filled out beforehand. I'm trying to figure out what the comments are talking about, and they seem to refer to a list of the possible cases. Is that list somewhere convenient?
-Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*