Re: Recording merges after repo conversion
- From
Peter Karlsson <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
- Date
- Oct 31, 2007, 09:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.62.0710311048450.13264@perkele.intern.softwolves.pp.se>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710310227340.4362@racer.site>
Johannes Schindelin:
> Why should it? This would contradict the whole "a commit sha1 hashes the > commit, and by inference the _whole_ history" principle.
Does it? Why can't the grafts file itself be committed to the repository and live in the history?
Well, yeah, the SHA1 hashing is one of Git's main strengths, but it also opens up some weaknesses.
-- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/