git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Subversion-style incrementing revision numbers

From
JDJoel Dice <dicej@mailsnare.net>
Date
Sep 19, 2006, 23:07 UTC
Message-ID
<Pine.LNX.4.62.0609191659350.9752@joeldicepc.ecovate.com>
In-Reply-To
<eepq7l$dc$1@sea.gmane.org>
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> Jakub Narebski wrote:
>
>> Joel Dice wrote:
>>
>>> I'm considering adopting Git for a medium-sized project which is currently
>>> managed using Subversion.  I've used Git for a few smaller projects
>>> already, and the thing I've missed most from Subversion is the convenience
>>> of incrementing revision numbers.  The following is a proposal to add this
>>> feature to Git.
>>>
>>>
>>> Rationale:
>>>
>>> Incrementing revision numbers (IRNs - an acronym I just made up) are
>>> useful in that they can be treated as auto-generated tags which are easier
>>> to remember and communicate than SHA hashes, yet do not require extra
>>> effort to create like real tags.  Also, they have the advantage of being
>>> chronologically ordered, so if I assert that a bug was fixed in revision
>>> 42 of a shared repository, everyone may assume that revision 45 has that
>>> fix as well.
>>
>> That is true _only_ if you have linear history. If you have multiple
>> concurrent branches, revision 42 can be in branch 'next', revision '45' in
>> topic branch 'xx/topic' which forked before revision 42, and do not have
>> the fix.
>
> Additionally, what does _chronological_ mean? Time the commit is recorded?
Yes.
> Remember that in distributed development commits can be fetched from other
> repository, or arrive via email and applied using git-am. In git you can
> also rebase branch. Git records merges, and said merges are sometimes
> just fast-forward. All those difficulties have to be solved for IRNs.

All of these boil down to pointing the head of a branch to a new commit object, right? I'm simply proposing that every time this happens, that new commit object (which may not really be *new*), should be appended to the IRN history file, along with any commits attached to it (as in the cases of fetch, etc.).

  - Joel
Previous: Jakub NarebskiNext: Shawn Pearce
Message 23 of 28 in “Subversion-style incrementing revision numbers”
  1. Joel DiceSep 19, 2006
  2. Petr BaudisSep 19, 2006
  3. Joel DiceSep 19, 2006
  4. Petr BaudisSep 19, 2006
  5. Joel DiceSep 19, 2006
  6. Shawn PearceSep 19, 2006
  7. Johannes SchindelinSep 19, 2006
  8. Shawn PearceSep 19, 2006
  9. Jakub NarebskiSep 19, 2006
  10. Linus TorvaldsSep 19, 2006
  11. Petr BaudisSep 19, 2006
  12. Linus TorvaldsSep 19, 2006
  13. Joel DiceSep 19, 2006
  14. Jakub NarebskiSep 20, 2006
  15. Joel DiceSep 20, 2006
  16. Junio C HamanoSep 20, 2006
  17. Robin RosenbergSep 20, 2006
  18. Petr BaudisSep 20, 2006
  19. Junio C HamanoSep 20, 2006
  20. Jakub NarebskiSep 19, 2006
  21. Petr BaudisSep 19, 2006
  22. Jakub NarebskiSep 19, 2006
  23. Joel DiceSep 19, 2006
  24. Shawn PearceSep 19, 2006
  25. Shawn PearceSep 19, 2006
  26. Joel DiceSep 19, 2006
  27. Shawn PearceSep 19, 2006
  28. Joel DiceSep 19, 2006

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.