Re: [PATCH] write-tree performance problems
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Chris Mason wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> With the basic changes I described before, the 100 patch time only goes down
> to 40s. Certainly not fast enough to justify the changes. In this case, the
> bulk of the extra time comes from write-tree writing the index file, so I
> split write-tree.c up into libwrite-tree.c, and created update-cache
> --write-tree.
Hmm. Are our index files too large, or is there some other factor?
I was considering using a chunked representation for *all* files (not just
blobs), which would avoid the original 'trees must reference other trees
or they become too large' issue -- and maybe the performance issue you're
referring to, as well?
--scott
Boston MI6 quiche LPMEDLEY BLUEBIRD PBSUCCESS jihad biowarfare non-violent protest
Yakima NRA EZLN DES hack SARANAC KMPLEBE Echelon PBCABOOSE security
( http://cscott.net/ )C. Scott Ananian <cscott@cscott.net>