Re: Last mile for 1.0
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Jun 6, 2005, 07:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506052358330.1876@ppc970.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vis0sugp7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > Is test 44 in t1000 (the first one in t1000 after the lib- > read-tree-m-3way prepares the test trees) good enough? Or do > you want more specific tests to make sure the logic catches > individual cases right?
I was more thinking of all the individual cases, and also the 2-way merge issue (which _should_ be a lot easier, but hey, I had tons of bugs there too).
For example, what should happen if you do a merge and you have a file in the index that isn't mentioned by any of the trees involved. I consider that a failure, since the merge will remove the file, and since it wasn't committed, it's now a "data lost" issue. But did I actually get it right? I have no idea.
Linus