Re: [PATCH] show changed tree objects with recursive git-diff-tree
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- May 21, 2005, 03:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505202025480.2206@ppc970.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vsm0hpbub.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Although I do not have immediate objections to what it tries to > do, I have to think about the intent of the patch and its > ramifications.
I really think it should be a totally separate flag to enable showing the sub-trees if the tree-blobification wants this.
In fact, I can pretty much _guarantee_ that the patch as posted is the wrong thing to do: it will do horribly wrong things for things like
git-whatchanged arch/i386/kernel/head.S
(but I haven't tried it - try it yourself. The correct output for the kernel archive is just a single commit, and a single blob change in that commit).
My bet is that the patch will end up showing every single changeset that touches anything under "arch/", since such _trees_ will be marked as interesting. Which is absolutely the wrong thing to do.
Nico, try it, maybe you'll prove me wrong.
Linus