git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Date
Apr 19, 2005, 22:38 UTC
Message-ID
<Pine.LNX.4.58.0504191525290.2274@ppc970.osdl.org>
In-Reply-To
<426583D5.2020308@mesatop.com>
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
>
> But perhaps a progress bar right about here might be
> a good thing for the terminally impatient.
> 
> real    3m54.909s
> user    0m14.835s
> sys     0m10.587s
> 
> 4 minutes might be long enough to cause some folks to lose hope.

Well, the real operations took only 15 seconds. What kind of horribe person are you, that you don't have all of the kernel in your disk cache already? Shame on you.

Or was the 4 minutes for downloading all the objest too?

Anyway, it looks like you are using pasky's scripts, and the old "patch-based" upgrade at that. You certainly will _not_ see the

	[many files patched]
	patching file mm/mmap.c
	..
if you use a real git merge. That's probable be the real problem here.

Real merges have no patches taking place _anywhere_. And they take about half a second. Doing an "update" of your tree should _literally_ boil down to

	#
	# "repo" needs to point to the repo we update from
	#
	rsync -avz --ignore-existing $repo/objects/. .git/objects/.
	rsync -L $repo/HEAD .git/NEW_HEAD || exit 1
	read-tree -m $(cat .git/NEW_HEAD) || exit 1
	checkout-cache -f -a
	update-cache --refresh
	mv .git/NEW_HEAD .git/HEAD

and if it does anything else, it's literally broken. Btw, the above does need my "read-tree -m" thing which I committed today.

(CAREFUL: the above is not a good script, because it _will_ just overwrite all your old contents with the stuff you updated to. You should thus not actually use something like this, but a "git update" should literally end up doing the above operations in the end, and just add proper checking).

And if that takes 4 minutes, you've got problems.
Just say no to patches. 
		Linus
PS: If you want a clean tree without any old files or anything else, for
that matter, you can then do a "show-files -z --others | xargs -0 rm", but
be careful: that will blow away _anything_ that wasn't revision controlled
with git. So don't blame me if your pr0n collection is gone afterwards.
Previous: Petr BaudisNext: Petr Baudis
Message 23 of 30 in “I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2”
  1. I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2Greg KH, Apr 19, 2005
  2. Greg KHApr 19, 2005
  3. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2005
  4. Greg KHApr 19, 2005
  5. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2005
  6. Greg KHApr 19, 2005
  7. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2005
  8. Daniel JacobowitzApr 19, 2005
  9. Greg KHApr 19, 2005
  10. Kenneth JohanssonApr 19, 2005
  11. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2005
  12. Martin SchlemmerApr 19, 2005
  13. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2005
  14. Martin SchlemmerApr 19, 2005
  15. Jan-Benedict GlawApr 20, 2005
  16. Lars FennebergApr 19, 2005
  17. Petr BaudisApr 19, 2005
  18. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2005
  19. Steven ColeApr 19, 2005
  20. Petr BaudisApr 19, 2005
  21. Junio C HamanoApr 19, 2005
  22. Petr BaudisApr 19, 2005
  23. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2005
  24. Petr BaudisApr 19, 2005
  25. Steven ColeApr 19, 2005
  26. Petr BaudisApr 19, 2005
  27. Linus TorvaldsApr 19, 2005
  28. Steven ColeApr 19, 2005
  29. Zlatko CalusicApr 20, 2005
  30. Linus TorvaldsApr 20, 2005

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.