Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Apr 18, 2005, 23:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504181613490.15725@ppc970.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050418221407.GA20290@kroah.com>
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> > Anyway, I try it this way and get:
You should update to the newest version anyway..
Show 7 quoted lines
> $ dotest ~/linux/patches/usb/usb-visor-tapwave_zodiac.patch > > Applying USB: visor Tapwave Zodiac support patch > > fatal: preparing to update file 'drivers/usb/serial/visor.c' not uptodate in cache > > What did I forget to do?
The most common reason is that the scripts _really_ want the index to match your current tree exactly. Run "update-cache --refresh". And if you have any uncommitted information, make sure to commit it first.
(Not _strictly_ true - you can leave edited files in your directory, and just hope the patch never touches them. The thing you should _not_ do is to do an "update-cache xxxx.c" to commit any changes to the 'index', because then the patch applicator will actually commit that one too).
Linus