Re: [PATCH] Make rsh protocol extensible

From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Date: Jun 3, 2005, 21:38 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0506031737090.30848-100000@iabervon.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050602205912.GD32189@pasky.ji.cz>

On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:

Show 12 quoted lines

> Dear diary, on Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:11:46AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> told me that...
> > This changes the rsh protocol to allow reporting failure in getting an
> > object without breaking the connection, and to allow other types of
> > request than for objects to be made. It is a preliminary to any more
> > extensive pull operation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
> 
> I wanted to apply it but then I figured out that I will better hold it
> and ask you what do you think about it now after few weeks. ;-) Should I
> still go on and apply it to Cogito?

At this point, I want to also put in a protocol version number. I'll send a replacement patch in a bit.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*