Re: Fw: Curiosity
- From
- João Victor Bonfim <joaovictorbonfim@protonmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 18, 2021, 00:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <NcaqpHwXfrPNnhzTamuF_xESMQUHMdzLNbHXKOJY59bkJdsT63Nk4PksqQXfqygUMO0EZRFBJeS90r59Tvt2I4kXH69TSe3RwQRXQThxRRA=@protonmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq1r2a220u.fsf@gitster.g>
Yeah, that sounds reasonable, Junio.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Em sexta-feira, 17 de dezembro de 2021 às 21:24, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> escreveu:
Show 19 quoted lines
> João Victor Bonfim JoaoVictorBonfim@protonmail.com writes: > > > > I suspect that for most algorithms and their implementations, this would > > > > > > not result in repeatable "recompressed" results. Thus the checked-out > > > > > > files might be different every time you checked them out. :( > > > > How or why? > > > > Sincere question. > > Two immediate things that come to my mind are lossy compression > > algorithms (jpeg pictures?) and compressors that do not necessarily > > produce bit-for-bit identical results (e.g. gzip by default embeds > > timestamp unless explicitly told not to from a command line option).