Any objectsions to enhancing git-log to show tags/branch heads?

I've recently noticed that I'm often firing up gitk for no other purpose than to see which changesets have which tags and branch heads. Often I'll fire up gitk, quickly look at the tags/branches, and then kill it before it's done parsing the repository, resulting in python errors as it dies.

So I'm wondering why we haven't arranged to have git-log show this information, and whether there would be any objections if "git-log" showed something like this:

commit 7d5021d2ef5d414908d8e4db26c324c1de19f9f1
Head: tytso-patches-20070223
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date:   Fri Feb 23 14:46:01 2007 -0500

Cherry pick "unload head on shutdown" patch

...

commit c8f71b01a50597e298dc3214a2f2be7b8d31170c
Tag: v2.6.21-rc1
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue Feb 20 20:32:30 2007 -0800

    Linux 2.6.21-rc1

Would there be objections in adding this to --pretty=medium (i.e., the default), or would it be better to add something like tihs to --pretty=full or --pretty=fuller?

The only reason why I could imagine not doing this by default would be a potential performance problem if there were thousands of heads or branch heads.

						- Ted