Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark

From: Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org> <7eggert@gmx.de>
Date: May 3, 2005, 01:16 UTC
Message-ID: <E1DSm1T-0002Tc-FV@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <3ZNdz-6gK-9@gated-at.bofh.it>

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2 May 2005, Ryan Anderson wrote:
>> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:31:06AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

Show 7 quoted lines

>> > That said, I think the /usr/bin/env trick is stupid too. It may be more
>> > portable for various Linux distributions, but if you want _true_
>> > portability, you use /bin/sh, and you do something like
>> > 
>> > #!/bin/sh
>> > exec perl perlscript.pl "$@"
>> if 0;

exec may fail.

#!/bin/sh exec perl -x $0 ${1+"$@"} || exit 127 #!perl

>> You don't really want Perl to get itself into an exec loop.
> 
> This would _not_ be "perlscript.pl" itself. This is the shell-script, and
> it's not called ".pl".

In this thread, it originally was.

-- 
"Our parents, worse than our grandparents, gave birth to us who are worse than
they, and we shall in our turn bear offspring still more evil."
        -- Horace (BC 65-8)