Re: How to mark a complete sub-directory assume-unchanged/skip-worktree?
- From
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
- Date
- Feb 27, 2014, 23:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <DAC4EA00279649D6B3F4DB1B3D662BA6@PhilipOakley>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8DV2uCQbfCP=Mf2qajVAtpTZvKKeCS2H4_o6LA3B96QAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Duy Nguyen" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org> > wrote: >> Have there been previous attempts to look at marking sub-dirs as >> --skip-worktree, or some other sentinel value for the missing tree? > > I dealt with this by creating partial index, that only contains > entries for interested subtrees. The index also stores the base tree > SHA-1, so write-tree can still create (full) new trees correctly from > partial index. > -- > Duy
Is there a particular bit of code I'd be worth studying for the partial index example to see how well it might fit my ideas?
-- Philip