Re: Submodule/contents conflict
- From
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
- Date
- Apr 27, 2017, 22:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <DAB03BFCBBCA4C4F95D21A86E3B1DF2F@PhilipOakley>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqa873ubiw.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 3:51 AM
Show 13 quoted lines
> "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes: > >> As I recall Christoph was using checkout to copy a file (e.g. a >> template file) from an older commit/revision into his worktree, and >> was suprised that this (git checkout <tree> <path>) also _staged_ the >> file, rather than simply letting it be in a modified/untracked state. > > This probably is taking it even further than the original topic, but > I raise this weather-balloon to see if anybody is interested. > > In the modern day, it might be useful if the "--working-tree-only" > mode added a new file as an intent-to-add entry to the index, but > that is not what "git apply (no other options)" (which is the gold
did you mean `git add` ? Or am I missing something.
> standard for command that operates on the working tree and/or on the > index) does, so it is not done in this patch. IOW, if you grab a > path that does not exist in your index out of <tree-ish>, you will > write out an untracked file to the working tree.
It sound like a good idea, as I wasn't aware of another easy way of doing it.
Show 87 quoted lines
> > -- >8 -- > Subject: [PATCH] checkout: add --working-tree-only option > > "git checkout <tree-ish> <pathspec>" has always copied the blob from > the tree-ish to the index before checking them out to the working tree. > > Some users may want to grab a blob out of a tree-ish directly to the > working tree, without updating the index, so that "git diff" can be > used to assess the damage and adjust the file contents taken from a > different branch to be more appropriate for the current branch. > > The new option "--working-tree-only" allows exactly that. > > In the hindsight, when a command works on the working tree and/or > the index, the usual convention is: > > - with no other option, the command works only on the working tree; > > - with "--cached" option, the command works only on the index; and > > - with "--index" option, the command works on both the working tree > and the index. > > So we probably should have triggered the default behaviour under the > "--index" option, and triggered this "--working-tree-only" mode of > behaviour when "--index" option is not given. From the same point > of view, "git checkout --cached <tree-ish> <pathspec>" would have > done the same as "git reset <tree-ish> <pathspec>" would do. And > that may have made the command set a bit more consistent. > > But that is merely a hindsight being 20/20, oh well. > > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> > --- > Documentation/git-checkout.txt | 22 +++++++++++++++------- > builtin/checkout.c | 10 +++++++++- > t/t2022-checkout-paths.sh | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-checkout.txt > b/Documentation/git-checkout.txt > index 8e2c0662dd..201677752e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-checkout.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-checkout.txt > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ SYNOPSIS > 'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] > [<start_point>] > 'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] > [--] <paths>... > 'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...] > +'git checkout' --working-tree-only <tree-ish> [--] [<paths>...] > > DESCRIPTION > ----------- > @@ -81,13 +82,14 @@ Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the > current branch. > 'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...:: > > When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not* > - switch branches. It updates the named paths in the working tree > - from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a > - commit). In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are > - meaningless and giving either of them results in an error. The > - <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish > - (i.e. commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given > - paths before updating the working tree. > + switch branches. In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options > + are meaningless and giving either of them results in an error. > ++ > +The command checks out blobs for paths that match the given > +<pathspec> from the index to the working tree. When an optional > +<tree-ish> is given, the blobs for paths that match the given > +<pathspec> are copied from the <tree-ish> to the index before > +they are checked out of the index. > + > 'git checkout' with <paths> or `--patch` is used to restore modified or > deleted paths to their original contents from the index or replace paths > @@ -101,6 +103,12 @@ specific side of the merge can be checked out of the > index by > using `--ours` or `--theirs`. With `-m`, changes made to the working tree > file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result. > > +'git checkout' --working-tree-only <tree-ish> [--] <pathspec>...:: > + Similar to `git checkout <tree-ish> [--] <pathspec>`, but > + the index file is left in the same state as it was before > + running this command.
I feel that the docs should also contain a little of the commit message highlighting that `This complements the usual convention of "--cached" and "--index" options for other commands.`, and would pick up on Stefan's "I didn't know that" response - A little education of the reader goes a long way, maybe ;-)
Show 87 quoted lines
> +
> +
> OPTIONS
> -------
> -q::
> diff --git a/builtin/checkout.c b/builtin/checkout.c
> index 9b2a5b31d4..d214e99521 100644
> --- a/builtin/checkout.c
> +++ b/builtin/checkout.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct checkout_opts {
> int overwrite_ignore;
> int ignore_skipworktree;
> int ignore_other_worktrees;
> + int no_index;
> int show_progress;
>
> const char *new_branch;
> @@ -268,6 +269,9 @@ static int checkout_paths(const struct checkout_opts
> *opts,
> die(_("Cannot update paths and switch to branch '%s' at the same time."),
> opts->new_branch);
>
> + if (opts->no_index && !opts->source_tree)
> + die(_("'--working-tree-only' cannot be used without tree-ish"));
> +
> if (opts->patch_mode)
> return run_add_interactive(revision, "--patch=checkout",
> &opts->pathspec);
> @@ -370,7 +374,9 @@ static int checkout_paths(const struct checkout_opts
> *opts,
> }
> }
>
> - if (write_locked_index(&the_index, lock_file, COMMIT_LOCK))
> + if (opts->no_index)
> + ; /* discard the in-core index */
> + else if (write_locked_index(&the_index, lock_file, COMMIT_LOCK))
> die(_("unable to write new index file"));
>
> read_ref_full("HEAD", 0, rev.hash, NULL);
> @@ -1161,6 +1167,8 @@ int cmd_checkout(int argc, const char **argv, const
> char *prefix)
> OPT_BOOL(0, "ignore-other-worktrees", &opts.ignore_other_worktrees,
> N_("do not check if another worktree is holding the given ref")),
> OPT_BOOL(0, "progress", &opts.show_progress, N_("force progress
> reporting")),
> + OPT_BOOL(0, "working-tree-only", &opts.no_index, N_("checkout to working
> tree only without touching the index")),
> +
> OPT_END(),
> };
>
> diff --git a/t/t2022-checkout-paths.sh b/t/t2022-checkout-paths.sh
> index f46d0499bc..8ea2e34c90 100755
> --- a/t/t2022-checkout-paths.sh
> +++ b/t/t2022-checkout-paths.sh
> @@ -78,4 +78,25 @@ test_expect_success 'do not touch files that are
> already up-to-date' '
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'working-tree-only option leaves checked out files
> unadded' '
> + git reset --hard &&
> + git checkout -b pu next &&
> + echo another >>file1 &&
> + echo exists >file3 &&
> + git add file3 &&
> + git commit -a -m another &&
> + git checkout next &&
> +
> + ! grep another file1 &&
> + git checkout --working-tree-only pu file1 file3 &&
> + grep another file1 &&
> + test_must_fail git grep --cached another file1 &&
> +
> + grep exists file3 &&
> + git ls-files file3 >actual &&
> + >expect &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +
> +'
> +
> test_done
> --
> 2.13.0-rc0-309-gb63395ed9e
>-- Thanks Philip