git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Submodule/contents conflict

From
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Date
Apr 27, 2017, 22:07 UTC
Message-ID
<DAB03BFCBBCA4C4F95D21A86E3B1DF2F@PhilipOakley>
In-Reply-To
<xmqqa873ubiw.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 
3:51 AM
Show 13 quoted lines
> "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:
>
>> As I recall Christoph was using checkout to copy a file (e.g. a
>> template file) from an older commit/revision into his worktree, and
>> was suprised that this (git checkout <tree> <path>) also _staged_ the
>> file, rather than simply letting it be in a modified/untracked state.
>
> This probably is taking it even further than the original topic, but
> I raise this weather-balloon to see if anybody is interested.
>
> In the modern day, it might be useful if the "--working-tree-only"
> mode added a new file as an intent-to-add entry to the index, but
> that is not what "git apply (no other options)" (which is the gold
did you mean `git add` ? Or am I missing something.
> standard for command that operates on the working tree and/or on the
> index) does, so it is not done in this patch.  IOW, if you grab a
> path that does not exist in your index out of <tree-ish>, you will
> write out an untracked file to the working tree.

It sound like a good idea, as I wasn't aware of another easy way of doing it.

Show 87 quoted lines
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] checkout: add --working-tree-only option
>
> "git checkout <tree-ish> <pathspec>" has always copied the blob from
> the tree-ish to the index before checking them out to the working tree.
>
> Some users may want to grab a blob out of a tree-ish directly to the
> working tree, without updating the index, so that "git diff" can be
> used to assess the damage and adjust the file contents taken from a
> different branch to be more appropriate for the current branch.
>
> The new option "--working-tree-only" allows exactly that.
>
> In the hindsight, when a command works on the working tree and/or
> the index, the usual convention is:
>
> - with no other option, the command works only on the working tree;
>
> - with "--cached" option, the command works only on the index; and
>
> - with "--index" option, the command works on both the working tree
>   and the index.
>
> So we probably should have triggered the default behaviour under the
> "--index" option, and triggered this "--working-tree-only" mode of
> behaviour when "--index" option is not given.  From the same point
> of view, "git checkout --cached <tree-ish> <pathspec>" would have
> done the same as "git reset <tree-ish> <pathspec>" would do.  And
> that may have made the command set a bit more consistent.
>
> But that is merely a hindsight being 20/20, oh well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> ---
> Documentation/git-checkout.txt | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> builtin/checkout.c             | 10 +++++++++-
> t/t2022-checkout-paths.sh      | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-checkout.txt 
> b/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
> index 8e2c0662dd..201677752e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
> 'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] 
> [<start_point>]
> 'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] 
> [--] <paths>...
> 'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...]
> +'git checkout' --working-tree-only <tree-ish> [--] [<paths>...]
>
> DESCRIPTION
> -----------
> @@ -81,13 +82,14 @@ Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the 
> current branch.
> 'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...::
>
>  When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not*
> - switch branches.  It updates the named paths in the working tree
> - from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a
> - commit).  In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are
> - meaningless and giving either of them results in an error.  The
> - <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish
> - (i.e.  commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given
> - paths before updating the working tree.
> + switch branches.  In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options
> + are meaningless and giving either of them results in an error.
> ++
> +The command checks out blobs for paths that match the given
> +<pathspec> from the index to the working tree.  When an optional
> +<tree-ish> is given, the blobs for paths that match the given
> +<pathspec> are copied from the <tree-ish> to the index before
> +they are checked out of the index.
> +
> 'git checkout' with <paths> or `--patch` is used to restore modified or
> deleted paths to their original contents from the index or replace paths
> @@ -101,6 +103,12 @@ specific side of the merge can be checked out of the 
> index by
> using `--ours` or `--theirs`.  With `-m`, changes made to the working tree
> file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result.
>
> +'git checkout' --working-tree-only <tree-ish> [--] <pathspec>...::
> + Similar to `git checkout <tree-ish> [--] <pathspec>`, but
> + the index file is left in the same state as it was before
> + running this command.

I feel that the docs should also contain a little of the commit message highlighting that `This complements the usual convention of "--cached" and "--index" options for other commands.`, and would pick up on Stefan's "I didn't know that" response - A little education of the reader goes a long way, maybe ;-)

Show 87 quoted lines
> +
> +
> OPTIONS
> -------
> -q::
> diff --git a/builtin/checkout.c b/builtin/checkout.c
> index 9b2a5b31d4..d214e99521 100644
> --- a/builtin/checkout.c
> +++ b/builtin/checkout.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct checkout_opts {
>  int overwrite_ignore;
>  int ignore_skipworktree;
>  int ignore_other_worktrees;
> + int no_index;
>  int show_progress;
>
>  const char *new_branch;
> @@ -268,6 +269,9 @@ static int checkout_paths(const struct checkout_opts 
> *opts,
>  die(_("Cannot update paths and switch to branch '%s' at the same time."),
>      opts->new_branch);
>
> + if (opts->no_index && !opts->source_tree)
> + die(_("'--working-tree-only' cannot be used without tree-ish"));
> +
>  if (opts->patch_mode)
>  return run_add_interactive(revision, "--patch=checkout",
>     &opts->pathspec);
> @@ -370,7 +374,9 @@ static int checkout_paths(const struct checkout_opts 
> *opts,
>  }
>  }
>
> - if (write_locked_index(&the_index, lock_file, COMMIT_LOCK))
> + if (opts->no_index)
> + ; /* discard the in-core index */
> + else if (write_locked_index(&the_index, lock_file, COMMIT_LOCK))
>  die(_("unable to write new index file"));
>
>  read_ref_full("HEAD", 0, rev.hash, NULL);
> @@ -1161,6 +1167,8 @@ int cmd_checkout(int argc, const char **argv, const 
> char *prefix)
>  OPT_BOOL(0, "ignore-other-worktrees", &opts.ignore_other_worktrees,
>  N_("do not check if another worktree is holding the given ref")),
>  OPT_BOOL(0, "progress", &opts.show_progress, N_("force progress 
> reporting")),
> + OPT_BOOL(0, "working-tree-only", &opts.no_index, N_("checkout to working 
> tree only without touching the index")),
> +
>  OPT_END(),
>  };
>
> diff --git a/t/t2022-checkout-paths.sh b/t/t2022-checkout-paths.sh
> index f46d0499bc..8ea2e34c90 100755
> --- a/t/t2022-checkout-paths.sh
> +++ b/t/t2022-checkout-paths.sh
> @@ -78,4 +78,25 @@ test_expect_success 'do not touch files that are 
> already up-to-date' '
>  test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'working-tree-only option leaves checked out files 
> unadded' '
> + git reset --hard &&
> + git checkout -b pu next &&
> + echo another >>file1 &&
> + echo exists >file3 &&
> + git add file3 &&
> + git commit -a -m another &&
> + git checkout next &&
> +
> + ! grep another file1 &&
> + git checkout --working-tree-only pu file1 file3 &&
> + grep another file1 &&
> + test_must_fail git grep --cached another file1 &&
> +
> + grep exists file3 &&
> + git ls-files file3 >actual &&
> + >expect &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +
> +'
> +
> test_done
> -- 
> 2.13.0-rc0-309-gb63395ed9e
>

-- Thanks Philip

Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 15 of 18 in “Submodule/contents conflict”
  1. Orgad ShanehApr 24, 2017
  2. Stefan BellerApr 24, 2017
  3. Philip OakleyApr 24, 2017
  4. Stefan BellerApr 24, 2017
  5. Jeff KingApr 25, 2017
  6. Jeff KingApr 25, 2017
  7. Philip OakleyApr 27, 2017
  8. Jeff KingApr 28, 2017
  9. Junio C HamanoMay 1, 2017
  10. Philip OakleyApr 25, 2017
  11. Junio C HamanoApr 26, 2017
  12. Stefan BellerApr 26, 2017
  13. Junio C HamanoApr 27, 2017
  14. Junio C HamanoApr 27, 2017
  15. Philip OakleyApr 27, 2017
  16. Junio C HamanoApr 28, 2017
  17. Junio C HamanoApr 25, 2017
  18. Stefan BellerApr 25, 2017

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.