Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2024, #02; Fri, 1)

> The "manual" to run the project on the maintainer side has this:
>
>    - If a topic that was picked up to 'seen' becomes and stays
>      inactive for 3 calendar weeks without having seen a clear
>      consensus that it is good enough to be moved to 'next', the
>      topic may be discarded from 'seen'.  Interested parties are
>      still free to revive the topic.  For the purpose of this
>      guideline, the definition of being "inactive" is that nobody
>      has discussed the topic, no new iteration of the topic was
>      posted, and no responses to the review comments were given.
>
> If the topic has been updated large-ish-ly since the previous
> rounds, it may deserve a fresh review, or the reviewers of the
> previous rounds may find it sufficient that they judge based on the
> change since the previous round (assuming that the earlier reviews
> did a good job of hunting problems in the previous rounds).  I do
> not offhand know who read the topic and how big a course-change the
> topic took during my absense, so hopefully somebody who is more
> familiar with the latest round can chime in before I dig the topic
> out from the bottom of my pile of backlog.