Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Assorted improvements salvaged from an earlier series

> On 2024-03-25 21:54, Dragan Simic wrote:
> > On 2024-03-25 21:49, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> >> The range-diff is particularly valuable exactly for this case (new
> >> versions of old patches) since it is a "diff" between the old patches
> >> and the new patches. Thus, it provides reviewers with a precise
> >> summary of what changed between, say, v2 and v3 of a series, and
> >> manifests as a concrete representation of what your prose explanation
> >> describes.
> >
> > I see, and I do understand the purpose of range-diffs:  they make
> > reviewing new patch versions significantly easier, by relieving the
> > reviewers from the need to track down what has been changed in the
> > current patch version.
>
> As a note, I kept my promise :) and have started providing range-diffs
> in patch submissions. [1]