Re: commit-msg hook possible bad behavior with -F <file>
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Dec 18, 2017, 18:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cTmRiSfY9+DsvEB7X_cL4AiAmq0FUb-CoDyc3HNDJLtow@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJ4+5mHMD+yW1ZDD6KJSnMtyygLUGiHzNPgPDZUi7+KUvOczkg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Seth Raymond <seth.c.raymond@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> If a commit is invoked with -F <file>, indicating that the commit > message should be read from an existing file, the the > prepare-commit-msg and commit-msg hooks do not operate on <file>. The > first argument to the hook is always <git_repo>/COMMIT_EDITMSG, rather > than <file>. > > Am I wrong in this line of thinking?
The content of <file> gets copied into COMMIT_EDITMSG, so the hook does see the supplied message, as expected. Given that the hook is allowed to edit the message, it makes sense that it works on COMMIT_EDITMSG rather than on <file> directly.